Miami

Did Miami Heat err with Bradley Beal, Damian Lillard bids?


Q: Ira, disappointing we had a good chance for Bradley Beal and didn’t go hard for him. It seems like we always are looking for the best player when we don’t even know if they will be available, such as the case with Damian Lillard. I know there is plenty of time to do something, but with no money to go after free agents, I hope we can upgrade over last year’s team through a trade. Otherwise, we’ll be re-signing our own free agents and adding a draft pick who might not be ready to help much. – Rich, Plantation.

A: There is no question that the Heat could have put similar expiring contracts into play for Bradley Beal as the Suns did with the Wizards (Kyle Lowry and Victor Oladipo instead of Phoenix’s Chris Paul and Landry Shamet). And it is undeniable that the Heat could have offered far better draft capital, had they elected to do so. So, in the void of the Heat ever discussing their maneuvering (as if their right), the answers here could be threefold: 1. The Heat wanted to save their draft capital for something better, as in Damian Lillard or someone else better. There is nothing wrong with dreaming big, as long as you can also tolerate a potential nightmare outcome. 2. The Heat insisted on the Wizards talking on the long-term money of Duncan Robinson as a means of somewhat mitigating the longer-term money being taken on with Beal. 3. The Heat decided that Bradley Beal was not worth entering into a luxury-tax threshold, under the new collective bargaining agreement, that is more punitive than any experience in any other sport.



Source link